Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jund Delirium | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Roots | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Bant Beanstalk , Domain Overlords , Domain Zur Overlords , Elves , Goblins , Golgari Analyst
Meta Performance Analysis
Scavenging Ooze ranks #170 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 42%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Scavenging Ooze is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 24.64 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Scavenging Ooze has a win rate of 73.9%, making it 1.0% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trostani, Three Whispers | Legendary Creature — Dryad | 5 | 74.0% | 1 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 19 | 70.0% | 6 |
| Lord Skitter, Sewer King | Legendary Creature — Rat Noble | 10 | 69.3% | 3 |
| Thunderous Velocipede | Artifact — Vehicle | 6 | 68.8% | 2 |
| Insidious Fungus | Creature — Fungus | 7 | 66.8% | 1 |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 6 | 63.6% | 1 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 5 | 62.9% | 2 |
| Melira, the Living Cure | Legendary Creature — Human Scout | 6 | 61.7% | 1 |
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 10 | 61.4% | 3 |
| Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 5 | 61.2% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Scavenging Ooze than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 7 | 83.3% | 73.5% | +9.8% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 80.8% | 73.2% | +7.5% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 10 | 78.0% | 73.5% | +4.5% |
| Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 10 | 77.6% | 74.7% | +3.0% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 5 | 80.8% | 78.4% | +2.4% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 6 | 76.5% | 74.2% | +2.2% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 10 | 75.0% | 72.9% | +2.1% |
| Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 10 | 74.5% | 73.2% | +1.3% |
| Maelstrom Pulse | Sorcery | 3 | 8 | 75.3% | 74.9% | +0.5% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 15 | 75.0% | 74.6% | +0.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Demons | 348 | 63.9% | 44.5% |
| Golgari Midrange | 296 | 38.1% | 40.5% |
| Temur Otters | 45 | 13.4% | 53.7% |
| Golgari Roots | 22 | 88.0% | 26.9% |
| Abzan Roots | 20 | 95.2% | 35.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.